In relation to the second point (concerning the “following” of which he speaks), Scheler projects an aesthetic image of following, but this is arbitrary, because he gives no rational grounds for it. The value, in the name of which one follows a master, is actually the value immanent to the master’s ethical experience. This belongs to the master’s ethos, but is not (necessarily) the value which reveals itself to the subject himself.27 Scheler’s idea of following is very close to the Augustinian idea
Page 59